Skip to main content

Trump’s Hierarchy of Needs


Abraham Maslow, in his Theory of Human Motivation, presented a hierarchy of needs. In there he drew a pyramid divided into five levels of ascending importance. At the very top—the apex of the pyramid—he had the need for self-actualization and transcendence. That, he said, was the last and ultimate human need. 

To the western world, the revelation was nothing short of what Archimedes found in his bathtub and thereafter ran out naked yelling, “Eureka, Eureka”.  That precisely is the reason that a paper written in 1943 is considered relevant and by and large cannot brook any challenge.




I mean a lot more profound versions vis-a-vis this hierarchy of needs were figured out and propounded by hundreds of our thinkers since 3000BCE. But then, west is west. It reinvents, rediscovers, and repackages what is by then common knowledge in India. And gets it patented too. 

For now, however, let’s go with this Maslow pyramid. 

One would expect that a man who is the President of the United States—the most powerful nation in the world—would have reached the top tier, i.e. self-actualisation. This Maslow guy couldn’t think of Nirvana and Moksha of course, limited as he was in his readings. Then there were limited experiences of life too. He seemingly said that the actualisation is when the man realises his potential and gets creative. All very positive. 

However, if Donald Trump realises his full potential by taking creativity to an extreme where he derides and negates everything that the recent election threw up in spite of what the rest of the humanity thinks, I suggest it is creative with a capital ‘C’. He knows he has to go, but his self-actualisation is from getting as troublesome to Joe Biden as possible. 

It is disruption of conventional thinking. Now, Disruption is something that is being touted as a desirable way going forward. Call him a vengeful man. Go ahead, but the idea of systematically defeating every ounce of an adversary's being, is self-actualisation. Eat your heart out, Abraham Maslow; the pyramid you made is pretty much juvenile. 

Says Josh ‘Livestock’ Boruff, “The answer is incredibly simple. It's a matter of choice. It's a matter of weighing the pros and cons and realizing things are simply better if you're vengeful. Vengeance is a lot more than just harming people. It's about empowerment, which is something everybody can appreciate. Plus, the morale boost from defeating an enemy in some form or another is great for self-esteem. Yes, vengeance does a lot of good for a man's spirit.”

 

***

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Life Experiences

Like all my friends, I too was once a 17-year old awkward looking human in that shaded area when you are considered a naïve boy in certain estimations and a grown up man in the other situations. It leaves you so confused that you behave as neither of those. And I have also used the adjective ‘awkward’. It is because, at that age, facial hair appear to the extent that you are unsure whether to shave or not.    In those good old days nobody asked you, “Son, what do you want to be when you grow up?” You generally were preached to from the pulpit. Unsure about what future held, I had to sit through sessions where three, mostly idle, older cousins and uncles ruled the roost. The agenda invariably was what I should be doing with my life. My Dad, an engineer himself and rather a busy man, didn’t have time for idle chatter. He gave all of two minutes to the first of those meetings and announced that I should go for an engineering career at Roorkee. He walked away and chose not to part...
3 comments
Read more

An immigrant’s America: two chapters and a long interlude

Back in mid-1960s, I loved everything American. This mindset developed after reading whatever American material I could lay my hands on—that included ‘Old Man and the Sea’ on one end and dozens of Earl Stanley Gardner mysteries on the other. Sunday morning shows of Hollywood movies of all genre couldn’t be missed. The menagerie included Ben Hur, Roman Holiday, Who is afraid of Virginia Wolf, Guns of Navarone, The Great Escape, and a lot many other classics.    To me, America was synonymous with modernity, spirit of inquiry, technological development and the ultimate destination for those who had a reasonable chance to get there. After my engineering degree, getting into a US Graduate School was the extent to which I allowed myself to look into future. Nothing else mattered. It happened. I was accepted at a great college in America’s southeast—cloud nine and all that. After a month of orientation with the new environs, I ventured out a bit. On a blind date, sought by me, I drew...
2 comments
Read more

Privatisation: Let’s learn from Tanzania

I wonder what this for-and-against ballyhoo is on privatisation of PSUs in India. It is simple; Government has no business running businesses. Other than the inevitable reduction in unnecessary manpower and therefrom creating some unemployment, there is generally no downside to privatisation. Is it then a debate on efficiency versus spurious employment? Tanzania — much smaller economy – privatised over 400 public companies within 10 years. They knew the manpower complements were 3 to 10 times bigger than what the work called for.  The country chose to bite the bullet and directed their attention to finding gainful employment opportunities thus making a positive contribution to the economy.    In India, PSUs showing reasonable gross profit are only in the oil and gas space, and in power and its distribution. These are areas the government is in a comfort zone because they fix the product prices. Coal India—not in the two above mentioned business areas—is perhaps the only n...
2 comments
Read more