Skip to main content

Gloves off, eh, Monsieur Macron


The French presidential election is only a year and a half away. It has to be won. France’s centre-right government wants to win it again, like any government would. 

Immigration being the issue on the top of the agenda, President Macron’s strategy looks like taking the well-proven path of screaming disapproval of immigrants, and then softening it after willing the elections.

This is not new. Let’s go back some years in France’s recent history. In April 2013, Harris Interactive reported that in a poll conducted across the country, 73 per cent of people said they viewed Islam negatively. Yet, 10 per cent of French population today is Muslim.

In November 2009, Nicolas Sarkozy was at the helm. He was unpopular. He was running out of time for he had already completed more than half of his term in office. The major concern ahead was that the voters were expected to give a bloody nose to Nicolas Sarkozy’s ruling right wing party in the regional elections. He launched a 3-month long debate on the need to redefine the values of France in the 21st century and what their collective future should be. The most critical issue of the government’s drive was the then current toughening up of French borders and increasing forced removals, which was the centre-right Sarkozy’s creation in 2007. In that sense the debate was seen as Sarkozy’s attempt at softening somewhat on immigration.

Regardless, the net immigration into France stood at over 470,000 between that year and 2016. 

The only time their politician speak the truth is when their political ambitions are exhausted. I mean, when they have no hope in the hell to win the public office. The example is a certain interview to two British authors, President Francois Hollande gave. He opened up only because he was nearing the completion of his term. It would be reasonable to assume he would have otherwise chosen to keep mum. He spoke his heart out when he said, “The fact that there is a problem (in France) with Islam is true. Nobody doubts that.” He drilled deeper and surprisingly arrived at the home truth, saying, “It’s not Islam itself that poses a problem for being a religion that is dangerous for the Republic but because it wants to assert itself as a religion inside the French Republic.”

But what did his successor, the same Mr Emanuel Macron, do? He came in 2017, and his term had pretty much just begun. The timing being perfect, the pitch on immigration could be conveniently changed. Witness the about turn. He has reportedly said, “The reality is that Europe is not experiencing a migration crisis of the same magnitude as the one it experienced in 2015. A country like Italy has not at all the same migratory pressure as last year. The crisis we are experiencing today in Europe is (only) a political crisis”. 

A liar, for dumb he certainly is not. The pattern was sickeningly familiar.

Alright then. Back to Mr Macron’s recent gloves off treatment of Muslims in his country prior to re-election. And with fanfare and optics too; starting with teasing cartoons which was akin to a school bully-like behaviour?

Mr Macron, you and your predecessors have created the problem. You have to solve the problem which is a lot more momentous than winning next elections. There is an ostentatious bare-knuckles way, and there can be quiet and effective ways. 

For now, for the obvious reason that the 73% of 2013 Harris Interactive polls has probably soared to 99% you will stick with the bare-knuckles approach. We understand, for the election has to be won. 

Thereafter, put your gloves on and try latter—the quiet and effective way.   

***


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Life Experiences

Like all my friends, I too was once a 17-year old awkward looking human in that shaded area when you are considered a naïve boy in certain estimations and a grown up man in the other situations. It leaves you so confused that you behave as neither of those. And I have also used the adjective ‘awkward’. It is because, at that age, facial hair appear to the extent that you are unsure whether to shave or not.    In those good old days nobody asked you, “Son, what do you want to be when you grow up?” You generally were preached to from the pulpit. Unsure about what future held, I had to sit through sessions where three, mostly idle, older cousins and uncles ruled the roost. The agenda invariably was what I should be doing with my life. My Dad, an engineer himself and rather a busy man, didn’t have time for idle chatter. He gave all of two minutes to the first of those meetings and announced that I should go for an engineering career at Roorkee. He walked away and chose not to part...

An immigrant’s America: two chapters and a long interlude

Back in mid-1960s, I loved everything American. This mindset developed after reading whatever American material I could lay my hands on—that included ‘Old Man and the Sea’ on one end and dozens of Earl Stanley Gardner mysteries on the other. Sunday morning shows of Hollywood movies of all genre couldn’t be missed. The menagerie included Ben Hur, Roman Holiday, Who is afraid of Virginia Wolf, Guns of Navarone, The Great Escape, and a lot many other classics.    To me, America was synonymous with modernity, spirit of inquiry, technological development and the ultimate destination for those who had a reasonable chance to get there. After my engineering degree, getting into a US Graduate School was the extent to which I allowed myself to look into future. Nothing else mattered. It happened. I was accepted at a great college in America’s southeast—cloud nine and all that. After a month of orientation with the new environs, I ventured out a bit. On a blind date, sought by me, I drew...

Privatisation: Let’s learn from Tanzania

I wonder what this for-and-against ballyhoo is on privatisation of PSUs in India. It is simple; Government has no business running businesses. Other than the inevitable reduction in unnecessary manpower and therefrom creating some unemployment, there is generally no downside to privatisation. Is it then a debate on efficiency versus spurious employment? Tanzania — much smaller economy – privatised over 400 public companies within 10 years. They knew the manpower complements were 3 to 10 times bigger than what the work called for.  The country chose to bite the bullet and directed their attention to finding gainful employment opportunities thus making a positive contribution to the economy.    In India, PSUs showing reasonable gross profit are only in the oil and gas space, and in power and its distribution. These are areas the government is in a comfort zone because they fix the product prices. Coal India—not in the two above mentioned business areas—is perhaps the only n...