Skip to main content

Gloves off, eh, Monsieur Macron


The French presidential election is only a year and a half away. It has to be won. France’s centre-right government wants to win it again, like any government would. 

Immigration being the issue on the top of the agenda, President Macron’s strategy looks like taking the well-proven path of screaming disapproval of immigrants, and then softening it after willing the elections.

This is not new. Let’s go back some years in France’s recent history. In April 2013, Harris Interactive reported that in a poll conducted across the country, 73 per cent of people said they viewed Islam negatively. Yet, 10 per cent of French population today is Muslim.

In November 2009, Nicolas Sarkozy was at the helm. He was unpopular. He was running out of time for he had already completed more than half of his term in office. The major concern ahead was that the voters were expected to give a bloody nose to Nicolas Sarkozy’s ruling right wing party in the regional elections. He launched a 3-month long debate on the need to redefine the values of France in the 21st century and what their collective future should be. The most critical issue of the government’s drive was the then current toughening up of French borders and increasing forced removals, which was the centre-right Sarkozy’s creation in 2007. In that sense the debate was seen as Sarkozy’s attempt at softening somewhat on immigration.

Regardless, the net immigration into France stood at over 470,000 between that year and 2016. 

The only time their politician speak the truth is when their political ambitions are exhausted. I mean, when they have no hope in the hell to win the public office. The example is a certain interview to two British authors, President Francois Hollande gave. He opened up only because he was nearing the completion of his term. It would be reasonable to assume he would have otherwise chosen to keep mum. He spoke his heart out when he said, “The fact that there is a problem (in France) with Islam is true. Nobody doubts that.” He drilled deeper and surprisingly arrived at the home truth, saying, “It’s not Islam itself that poses a problem for being a religion that is dangerous for the Republic but because it wants to assert itself as a religion inside the French Republic.”

But what did his successor, the same Mr Emanuel Macron, do? He came in 2017, and his term had pretty much just begun. The timing being perfect, the pitch on immigration could be conveniently changed. Witness the about turn. He has reportedly said, “The reality is that Europe is not experiencing a migration crisis of the same magnitude as the one it experienced in 2015. A country like Italy has not at all the same migratory pressure as last year. The crisis we are experiencing today in Europe is (only) a political crisis”. 

A liar, for dumb he certainly is not. The pattern was sickeningly familiar.

Alright then. Back to Mr Macron’s recent gloves off treatment of Muslims in his country prior to re-election. And with fanfare and optics too; starting with teasing cartoons which was akin to a school bully-like behaviour?

Mr Macron, you and your predecessors have created the problem. You have to solve the problem which is a lot more momentous than winning next elections. There is an ostentatious bare-knuckles way, and there can be quiet and effective ways. 

For now, for the obvious reason that the 73% of 2013 Harris Interactive polls has probably soared to 99% you will stick with the bare-knuckles approach. We understand, for the election has to be won. 

Thereafter, put your gloves on and try latter—the quiet and effective way.   

***


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Not similar, therefore not equal

  If two things are not similar, they cannot be equal. This is true in mathematics, and mathematics doesn’t lie. No two men are similar, and no two women are similar either. It is plain to see that if they are not even similar, they cannot be equal. Given the large number of people (all different from each other), the governors in the system are faced with a tangled ball of wool that refuses to show its loose end from where they can begin. Understandably, for purposes of governance, administrations categorize a large number of unequal individuals into sets that can then be addressed to en masse.   Most real-world situations have hundreds and thousands of variables and intangibles. Models are constructed so that complex situations can be given a shape and form that is amenable to analysis and policy formulation. The challenge in constructing a model is that on one hand the model has to be a simplified version of the complex reality, and on the other its oversimplification ...

An immigrant’s America: two chapters and a long interlude

Back in mid-1960s, I loved everything American. This mindset developed after reading whatever American material I could lay my hands on—that included ‘Old Man and the Sea’ on one end and dozens of Earl Stanley Gardner mysteries on the other. Sunday morning shows of Hollywood movies of all genre couldn’t be missed. The menagerie included Ben Hur, Roman Holiday, Who is afraid of Virginia Wolf, Guns of Navarone, The Great Escape, and a lot many other classics.    To me, America was synonymous with modernity, spirit of inquiry, technological development and the ultimate destination for those who had a reasonable chance to get there. After my engineering degree, getting into a US Graduate School was the extent to which I allowed myself to look into future. Nothing else mattered. It happened. I was accepted at a great college in America’s southeast—cloud nine and all that. After a month of orientation with the new environs, I ventured out a bit. On a blind date, sought by me, I drew...

Dussehra: A Day for Introspection

Dussehra is a great day to repose your faith in all that is just and ethical. It also makes you rethink your prevarication for aggressive retribution to those who may have truly deserved it. It makes you realise as to how a man of incredible knowledge and immense physical strength can sink into horrendously immoral acts. Ravan had read all Shastra(s) around and developed immense concentration to invoke celestial forces to come to his help. None on Earth was wiser than him.      But then, what to do with a man like that if he displays that he doesn’t know right from wrong? I mean what does Ram Bhagwan do if the ruffian—or, super-pundit, if you so like to describe him—chooses to kidnap his wife? Should he go into a conference with his brother, Laxman, bring the kidnapper’s well-known knowledge, wisdom and certifications from Adiyogi Shiva—no less—into consideration, and thereupon feel sympathetic towards him? Is a wife lost in the deal to be treated as just some collateral ...