Skip to main content

Not similar, therefore not equal

 


If two things are not similar, they cannot be equal. This is true in mathematics, and mathematics doesn’t lie. No two men are similar, and no two women are similar either. It is plain to see that if they are not even similar, they cannot be equal. Given the large number of people (all different from each other), the governors in the system are faced with a tangled ball of wool that refuses to show its loose end from where they can begin. Understandably, for purposes of governance, administrations categorize a large number of unequal individuals into sets that can then be addressed to en masse.  

Most real-world situations have hundreds and thousands of variables and intangibles. Models are constructed so that complex situations can be given a shape and form that is amenable to analysis and policy formulation. The challenge in constructing a model is that on one hand the model has to be a simplified version of the complex reality, and on the other its oversimplification would perhaps not be a true representation. In this process, one invariably makes certain assumptions. Thereafter while planning at the macroeconomic level the process would, in effect, evolve plans based on a host of ridiculous generalizations. How sensible does it appear, for instance, when it may be inherent in the government’s dispensation that all men between 18 and 25 belonging to a certain region and a certain income group think alike?  

In socioeconomic modeling, we assume that all men are equal. Not only that, in the name of egalitarian dispensation, we zealously go on assuming men as equal to women. It is unfortunately the most unrealistic assumption, which we go on living with. This leads to skewed policy formulations, which eventually reflect in aggrieved masses.

Granted that placing people in different groups helps selective elimination, which, in turn, narrows the band of alternate choices to a manageable size. However, caution is the key in such an exercise. These classifications should remain tools for administrations rather than badges on the foreheads of our people.

That said, it is necessary that equality we try for must essentially be equality in opportunities provided to our people. These should be lower school and college fees, uniform and book allowances, free mid-career refresher courses, and many other possible supports. A whole group tagged by its religious beliefs, tribe or sex should not be provided safe havens where they would ensconce themselves without delivering what that position demands.

Nothing should be reserved for any set of individuals, no matter what tag they bear on their chests. For instance, men and women alike would go through the selection process our armed forces have designed. Many men fail to pass muster and some women fail too. The selection is based on the yardsticks that are cogent with the needs of the armed forces.      

Airlines worldwide started out with a “women only” norm in their in-flight service for they thought it was their business need. They changed that at some point in time, for we now see many men serving as stewards and pursers.

Coming to the workplace, this equality thing manifests itself in several ways. One of them is the idea of seamless office space where glass cabins and wood partitions are torn down to make the CEO look equal to the manager and the intern who joined the other day. Some offices continue with the ethos, while most quickly relinquish it. Reason: it simply is not very smart to have your business conversations disturbed by your colleague sitting next to you. This and other such steps are misadventures emanating from incapacity to distinguish between equality of opportunity and apparent equality that shall not add any value.   

Merit, defined in terms of number of certificates and diplomas, does not have universal appeal. There are situations where athletic build would be a merit, and there are situations where nimble fingers are desirable. Jobs can obviously not be reserved for people who may consider themselves meritorious on any one particular measure they fancy.

Equality can only be a qualifier for opportunity, not for people.

Pradeep Goorha

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Vaccine Conundrum

A vaccine developed and ready to be injected in less than one year is a miracle that no research laboratory or pharmaceutical company would have dreamed of before 2020 began. Their track record has been that Jonas Salk’s lightning-fast development of polio vaccine in less than 4 years, and Ebola vaccine was approved in December 2019 after the first Ebola incidence was found in 1976, i.e. more than 40 years after.  From discovery to approved vaccination is a 10-year long process involving 2-5 years of discovery research, 2 years of pre-clinical period, 5 years of clinical development at its very best, 1-2 years of regulatory approval, and then of course comes in the manufacturer. The clinical development period has its 3 phases that is creating the buzz we hear day in and day out these days. Phase I is when researchers concentrate on the question, “Is it safe?” Phase II tries to establish whether the vaccine is activating an immune response or not. Then comes Phase III when they ans...
Post a Comment
Read more

An immigrant’s America: two chapters and a long interlude

Back in mid-1960s, I loved everything American. This mindset developed after reading whatever American material I could lay my hands on—that included ‘Old Man and the Sea’ on one end and dozens of Earl Stanley Gardner mysteries on the other. Sunday morning shows of Hollywood movies of all genre couldn’t be missed. The menagerie included Ben Hur, Roman Holiday, Who is afraid of Virginia Wolf, Guns of Navarone, The Great Escape, and a lot many other classics.    To me, America was synonymous with modernity, spirit of inquiry, technological development and the ultimate destination for those who had a reasonable chance to get there. After my engineering degree, getting into a US Graduate School was the extent to which I allowed myself to look into future. Nothing else mattered. It happened. I was accepted at a great college in America’s southeast—cloud nine and all that. After a month of orientation with the new environs, I ventured out a bit. On a blind date, sought by me, I drew...
2 comments
Read more

Dussehra: A Day for Introspection

Dussehra is a great day to repose your faith in all that is just and ethical. It also makes you rethink your prevarication for aggressive retribution to those who may have truly deserved it. It makes you realise as to how a man of incredible knowledge and immense physical strength can sink into horrendously immoral acts. Ravan had read all Shastra(s) around and developed immense concentration to invoke celestial forces to come to his help. None on Earth was wiser than him.      But then, what to do with a man like that if he displays that he doesn’t know right from wrong? I mean what does Ram Bhagwan do if the ruffian—or, super-pundit, if you so like to describe him—chooses to kidnap his wife? Should he go into a conference with his brother, Laxman, bring the kidnapper’s well-known knowledge, wisdom and certifications from Adiyogi Shiva—no less—into consideration, and thereupon feel sympathetic towards him? Is a wife lost in the deal to be treated as just some collateral ...
1 comment
Read more