Skip to main content

Kohli and Smith, a la Tharoor

 Kohli is all brio prior to steadying himself to face the ball. Thereafter, an uncanny blend of organization and destruction, fricassees a delectable stew. Smith appears antsier with his outre and wacky routine at the crease. You agonize whether that is an idiosyncratic boondoggle or an act of some substance. For some recondite reason though that prefatory drouks quietude in him, and readies him to lacerate the bowler: the final product a non sequitur to what was transpiring when the bowler was readying himself for the run up to the crease. Or, is it a carefully woven phantasmagoria?

Quite a study of contrasts. Kohli, more symphoric than Smith. Smith less aesthetic than Kohli. Kohli, all style and will carve out a shot that calls for picking up your jaw from umbilicus level and thereabouts. Don’t get me wrong though; he can at times commit inexplicable lapsus calamis in that last fraction of a second. Smith, all fidgety for some agonizing seconds but transforming into a grace all his own and executing a shot from gauche positions that defy logic; an eldritch spectacle that will confuse your facial muscles on what expression to assume. I mean gripping the bat as he does he shouldn’t be able to deliver those offside shots. A call for banning those kind of wrists is in order to restore an even playing field in the game of cricket.

You may consider taking your 12-year old through Kohli’s videos but will have to find a way to explain his short backlift and short follow through. Smith’s you will consider a tad too burlesque to qualify as batting touchstone, and will probably skip his videos.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Whippet: the next big thing in cricket

Those who love the sport of cricket, love it with uncommon passion. They love everything about cricket: the nuances, the idiosyncrasies, the enigma called the pitch, the works. Until recently, the sport was played only in England and its erstwhile colonies; there wasn’t any exposure to the sport many countries around the world. The trouble with cricket has been its five-day duration with breaks for lunch, tea, and drinks. For most people, no matter what the sport, a game should reasonably end in an hour or two. This 5-day long rigmarole was plainly too arduous to hold much appeal. Still worse was the possibility that the game could very well end undecided—no winner, no loser, that is. Cricket was a hard sell to countries that did not have the sport in the DNA sequences of its people. It was a lot easier for old loyal within the British Commonwealth countries to get their younger lot excited about it, its dispersion beyond the countries’ boundaries was far more challenging. The spectato...

The Vaccine Conundrum

A vaccine developed and ready to be injected in less than one year is a miracle that no research laboratory or pharmaceutical company would have dreamed of before 2020 began. Their track record has been that Jonas Salk’s lightning-fast development of polio vaccine in less than 4 years, and Ebola vaccine was approved in December 2019 after the first Ebola incidence was found in 1976, i.e. more than 40 years after.  From discovery to approved vaccination is a 10-year long process involving 2-5 years of discovery research, 2 years of pre-clinical period, 5 years of clinical development at its very best, 1-2 years of regulatory approval, and then of course comes in the manufacturer. The clinical development period has its 3 phases that is creating the buzz we hear day in and day out these days. Phase I is when researchers concentrate on the question, “Is it safe?” Phase II tries to establish whether the vaccine is activating an immune response or not. Then comes Phase III when they ans...

Privatisation: Let’s learn from Tanzania

I wonder what this for-and-against ballyhoo is on privatisation of PSUs in India. It is simple; Government has no business running businesses. Other than the inevitable reduction in unnecessary manpower and therefrom creating some unemployment, there is generally no downside to privatisation. Is it then a debate on efficiency versus spurious employment? Tanzania — much smaller economy – privatised over 400 public companies within 10 years. They knew the manpower complements were 3 to 10 times bigger than what the work called for.  The country chose to bite the bullet and directed their attention to finding gainful employment opportunities thus making a positive contribution to the economy.    In India, PSUs showing reasonable gross profit are only in the oil and gas space, and in power and its distribution. These are areas the government is in a comfort zone because they fix the product prices. Coal India—not in the two above mentioned business areas—is perhaps the only n...